The Best AI Visibility Tools in 2026

Profound leads the six AI visibility tools ranked here for 2026, with the deepest analytics and the broadest enterprise adoption, and the right pick still depends on whether your team's gap is seeing, doing, or proving.
Measurement alone no longer separates these tools since every one now shows visibility
Almost none of them can connect AI search activity to revenue
Match the choice to the team you actually have
A year ago, just seeing how your brand showed up in ChatGPT felt like an edge. Now every tool here does that, so measurement alone is no longer the question. What separates these products is what they do after the dashboard loads, how deep the analysis goes, whether they help you act, and whether they can connect any of it to revenue. We ranked them on the whole picture, and we have tried to be honest about who each one is really for, including the ones that are not for most people.
The five criteria used to rank these AI visibility tools
How well it finds the prompts that actually matter, since tracking a list you guessed at measures the wrong thing precisely
How honestly it measures, whether it shows how you are described and at the product level, not just whether the brand name turns up
Whether it helps you act, or only reports. The test is what it does the morning after a bad number
Whether it can tie the work to revenue, which almost none of them can
Who has to run it, since a self-serve tool assumes a team with time and skill that not every company has
The six AI visibility tools ranked for 2026, with who each fits and how each is priced, as of October 2026.
Rank and tool | Best for | Starting price | Free tier |
|---|---|---|---|
1. Profound | Enterprise teams that want the deepest measurement | Custom (Enterprise) | Trial |
2. AirOps | Teams whose bottleneck is producing content | Free Insights tier, paid by task volume | Yes |
3. Petra Labs | Teams that want AI search run end to end for them | Quote only | No |
4. Evertune | Brands focused on perception | $800/mo (Pro) | No |
5. Otterly | Small teams taking a first look | $29/mo | Trial |
6. Peec AI | Agencies and multi-brand teams | $95/mo | Trial |
1. Profound
The most complete platform in the category, and the one to beat. Profound is the scale and funding leader, recently valued at $1.8 billion and used by more than 10% of the Fortune 500, and the product backs up the reputation. Its analytics are the deepest here, with detailed answer-engine insights, estimates of how often prompts get asked, and reporting built for large teams.
Starting price | Custom (Enterprise) |
|---|---|
Pricing model | Free trial, then quoted Enterprise |
Free tier | Trial |
Best for | Enterprise teams with staff to act on data |
Wrong for | Small teams on a budget |
Weakness | Measurement-led, no revenue link built in |
It is now adding agents that act on the data. The honest knock is that it is measurement-led, so the doing and the proving still largely fall to you, and apart from a free trial, the platform is priced for the enterprise. For most serious teams that want the clearest view and can act on it, it is the safe and strong default.
2. AirOps
The pick for teams whose problem is producing, not just seeing. AirOps frames itself as a growth platform rather than a monitor, built to help you know where to act and ship content and changes quickly, and it reports fast gains in AI-attributed signups for some customers. If you already know your strategy and want to move at volume, it is genuinely strong.
Starting price | Free Insights tier |
|---|---|
Pricing model | By task volume, top tiers quoted |
Free tier | Yes |
Best for | Teams that know the strategy and need output |
Wrong for | Teams still deciding what to say |
Weakness | Lighter on measurement, learning curve |
The trade-offs are the ones that come with any automation-heavy approach. The output is only as good as the judgment behind it, and it does not build the kind of model that ties the work back to revenue.
3. Petra Labs
The option for teams that want AI search run end to end for them. Petra Labs combines its own visibility software with an operating team that manages prompt tracking, weekly strategy, and execution across owned media, earned media, PR, and social media management. It also builds a custom attribution model for each client, mapping AI search activity to that company's own revenue or bookings data. Engagements are custom and quoted. Public customers include Zapier, Rippling, and Four Seasons.
Starting price | Quote only |
|---|---|
Pricing model | Custom engagement |
Free tier | No |
Best for | Teams that want AI search run for them |
Wrong for | Teams that want a self-serve tool |
Weakness | No self-serve tier |
It fits teams that want AI search handled end to end and have the budget for a premium engagement.
4. Evertune
Best if your worry is perception rather than presence. Evertune scores how a brand is framed in answers, sentiment and positioning, backed by a large opt-in panel, and it has moved into AI advertising with a ChatGPT ad agent. That focus on how you are talked about is a useful angle the others mostly skip. The published Pro plan is $800 a month, with enterprise pricing custom. Like most here, it measures and frames the problem well and leaves the execution to you.
Starting price | $800/mo (Pro) |
|---|---|
Pricing model | Published Pro tier, enterprise custom |
Free tier | No |
Best for | Brands where perception and framing matter |
Wrong for | Teams that only need mention counts |
Weakness | Breadth over depth, ad agent unproven |
5. Otterly
The easiest place to start, and the friendliest on budget. Otterly is a simple way to watch how your brand shows up across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Gemini, and Copilot, with a free trial and a setup that does not need a specialist. For a small team taking its first real look, it is a sensible first step. It is built for monitoring, so it tells you where you stand more than it helps you change it.
Starting price | $29/mo |
|---|---|
Pricing model | Self-serve tiers |
Free tier | Trial |
Best for | Small teams taking a first look |
Wrong for | Teams that need depth or execution |
Weakness | Monitoring only, shallower analytics |
6. Peec AI
Best for marketing teams and agencies juggling several brands. Peec focuses on clean analytics, with prompt tagging and tracking across countries, which suits anyone managing more than one account or working across markets. As with the rest of this tier, the analysis is the product and the doing stays with you.
Starting price | $95/mo |
|---|---|
Pricing model | Self-serve, monthly or annual |
Free tier | Trial |
Best for | Agencies and multi-brand teams |
Wrong for | Single-brand teams needing execution |
Weakness | Analytics only, the doing stays with you |
Which AI visibility tool to pick for each team shape
If you want the strongest all-around platform and have a team to use it, Profound is the pick (see the full head-to-head against Evertune and AirOps for how the tradeoffs actually play out). If your bottleneck is producing at speed, AirOps. If perception is your concern, Evertune. If you are starting out or watching costs, Otterly, and Peec if you run several brands. And if you'd rather have the work run for you than operate a tool, Petra Labs covers measurement, execution, and attribution as a single engagement. Match the choice to the team you actually have, not to whoever spends the most on marketing.
Frequently asked questions
What is the best AI visibility tool overall?
For most teams, Profound is the strongest all-around choice, with the deepest analytics and the broadest adoption. The right pick still depends on whether your gap is seeing, doing, or proving.
Which is best for a small team or a tight budget?
Otterly is the easiest and most affordable way to start, and Peec is a good option once you are managing more than one brand.
Do any of them do the work for me?
Most report, and some are adding agents that help with execution. Petra Labs is the one on this list that runs the work for you, with an operating team on top of its software and attribution tied to each client's revenue data.
Can any of them connect AI search to revenue?
Not really, not on their own. Connecting AI search activity to revenue is the hardest part of this whole category, and most tools leave it to you. A few managed services take it on as part of the engagement, but it is early and unproven at scale, and most teams will not need that level yet.








